Monday, September 3, 2007

Gardner, Bloom and Dale

Three different theories have made a great impact on the field of education. These theories are Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, Bloom's taxonomy, and Dale's cone of experience. Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences suggest that eight different types of intelligences exist. It suggests that the traditional notion of intelligence, based on I.Q. testing, is far too limited. Gardner's multiple intelligences propose a wider range for human potential. In relation to student learning this theory is saying that different children have different stregths and learn in many different ways. Bloom's taxonomy identifies six hiearchical levels to the mastery of information. Each level leads to the next and a child cannot reach a level until they have mastered the one before. This theory is very structured. Dale's cone of experience diplays the effectivness of techniques used in education. Dale suggested that real experiences are the best way to learn material and that reading material is the worst way. In relation to student learning Dale's theory suggests that more sensory channels used when learning material, the more the students will remember.

Each of these theories supports and detracts from technology integration for learning in an early elementary classroom. Gardner's theory supports technology integration in the classroom, because this integration may offer many programs that directly relate to the individual intelligences. However, if certain programs do not support the different intelligences or are not set up in a proficent way, this theory would detract from technology integration. Bloom's taxonomy also supports technology integration in an early elementary classroom. If children learn at a young age to work with computers and other technological devices the will keep developing their skills. Dale's cone of experience also supports technology integration, because techology can provide very engaging and hands-on experiences. According to this theory, these types of programs are the most effective for student learning. This theory could also detract, because teachers could learn to rely too much on computers. In an early elementary classroom there are many things that the students should learn by experieces that computers cannot offer.

Each one of these theories relates to type 1, 11, or 111 uses of technology. Gardners theory realtes best to type 11, because the types of applications on computers allows students to work with out the aid of their teachers. For example, a liguistic learner may be able to use a word processing application to study with out any direction from the teacher. Bloom's taxonomy relates to type 1, because it is the teachers responsibility to implement the correct programs for success. Dale's cone of experience relates to type 111, because while technology can add to and enhance a teacher's lesson, the teacher must be there to guide and provide real life experiences.

2 comments:

Lilo said...

Sam's post was well thought out and well written. I find it very interesting that you related Dale's theory to connecting most to type III technology. You mentioned that having technology in the classroom relates to real life situations. I wanted to comment on this because as children we could use computers, but it was not a necessity. Now it seems that having computers and other technology in the classroom is a necessity because no matter what field of study a person goes into, they will have to use some computer devise at some point. I am simply curious to see how you feel about this point. Do you think it is a good thing that the world has gone to such a technologically based environment?

gebunky said...

This blog was well writtern and I thought she did a nice job writing about all three theories. Its funny how each theory relates to type one two and three. That was a great observation.What do you think about all these different types of theories and should e hvae them?